A New Year's Resolution (Or "Don't Sweat The Small Stuff")

For the last few days, I've been thinking about what I can do in 2020 to make my life better.  Yes, it's once again time to make those New Year's resolutions, which half of us will break within two months...kidding, but I digress. 

It occurs to me that I frequently involve myself in contentious political debates.  Some of these are rather civil in nature.  However, often the various discussions devolve into shouting matches and petty insults.  They also can produce great anger, which is not healthy for me (or anybody else, for that matter) to have a lot of. 

I realize that anger and division seems to be a national problem, as it runs rampant through our communities.  Knowing this, my main resolution for 2020 is to try to stem the tide of my own personal anger.  This means not involving myself in so many political debates; to an effect, choosing my battles a bit more carefully.  Indeed, not everything is worth the effort of getting upset about it. 

Now on to an interesting sub-topic.  Fellow music history buffs will note that in 1972, country artist Rick Nelson released a song called "Garden Party".  In the song, Nelson tells of his playing an all-star concert at Madison Square Garden (Nelson was booed for his performance, and left the concert early). 

There's a lot of wisdom to be found in music; this particular hit is no exception to that.  I find these to be the most relevant lyrics of said song;

"Well, it's all right now; I learned my lesson well.  You can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself". (1)

I have come to understand that, as Nelson said, I will never be able to please everyone.  This being the case, if people are hell-bent on disagreeing with me, I should let them disagree...and let it go.  
You see, there will always be somebody who disagrees with me; some of these people may even call me an idiot (or worse).  Even so, if I stay true to my own self and my own beliefs, I'll be doing all right. 

This is my primary resolution for 2020; don't get too upset about the little things.  As many have said before, "don't sweat the small stuff; (and) it's all small stuff"!

Rebuttal To Fargo Forum

Author's note: On December 22nd, an editorial appeared in the "Fargo Forum" entitled "How Can Christians Be Trump Supporters?"  As I cannot find how to submit a reply via the paper's website, I am posting such reply here. 
_________________________________________

To Whom It May Concern,

Recently, I had the opportunity to read one of your paper's editorials, this specifically being from the twenty-second of December.  I find myself at odds with the arguments that you have made about President Donald Trump; to wit, I offer this rebuttal.  

In your article, many assumptions are made about the president's behavior and statements.  These suppositions either fail the logic test, or are demonstrably false.  

First, you say that President Trump "has sown division...(and demonized) anyone who disagrees with him".  It is true that we are a nation that, seemingly, is divided.  However, this division didn't start with Trump.  Liberals have been attempting to divide this country for years; frankly, Barack Obama managed to do that to a remarkable effect.  During his eight years in office, Mr. Obama divided us racially, ethnically, and on religious lines.  If you're not willing to call Obama out for his divisive actions, then your criticism on this subject is hypocritical (at best).  

Second, you correctly point out that Trump has appointed many judges who are staunchly against abortion.  Your argument seems to be that by supporting these appointments, religious conservatives "have struck an unsavory bargain".  To this, I wonder about the beliefs of your staff.  Whether you believe this or not, abortion is unquestionably murder.  Does your paper support unrestricted abortions, in this fashion? 

For a moment, allow me to turn your main question on its head.  If your staff indeed does support the legality of abortion, how can your publication even pretend to be a Christian-based newspaper? The simple fact is that you cannot support abortion while being a Christian.  As previously explained, it is murder, whichever way you slice it.  Keeping this in mind, let us remember the Sixth Commandment; "thou shalt not kill".  

Once again, I address your main question, as stated; "if you call yourself a Christian, how can you be a Trump supporter?" My answer to this question is "very easily".  Yes, the president sometimes says and does things that I disagree with.  However, in the bigger picture of "mak(ing) America great", I can forgive these slight disagreements. 

Even if President Trump is your enemy, it is said that we should love our enemies, and "forgive (them their) trespasses, as we forgive those who have trespassed against us".  This belief is at the core of Christianity, in all its forms and sects.  If you're unwilling to forgive your enemies, then perhaps you should reconsider what it means to be a Christian.  You shouldn't sell your soul for political or social gain..."woe to those who do evil, and call it good". 

The New Scare (And Edward Murrow)

The inquiry into the possible impeachment of President Donald Trump has me thinking about a similar time in our nation's history.  

Let us, for the moment, flashback to the early 1950s.  America and her allies had just emerged victorious from World War II; the world was at peace.  This notwithstanding, another menace was beginning to appear on the horizon; the spectre of communism in the United States.  (1)

Fears of communist infiltration were brought to a head when in 1950, US Senator Joseph McCarthy (a Republican from Wisconsin) charged that the State Department was "infested with communists" (McCarthy would later allege that there was also rampant communism in the army). (2)  Enter one Edward R. Murrow, the host of a CBS program called "See It Now".  Criticizing the senator, Murrow said,

"It is necessary to investigate before legislating, but the line between investigating and persecuting is a very fine one, and the junior Senator from Wisconsin has stepped over it repeatedly.  His primary achievement has been in confusing the public mind...we must remember that accusation is not proof, and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law." (3)

It seems to me that history is repeating itself.  Congressman Adam Schiff has taken it upon himself to investigate our president, which he has every right to do.  The problem, then, is not in the investigation itself, but the denial of due process.  The defense has not been allowed to present any witnesses, nor have they been afforded the opportunity to question Schiff's witnesses.  And we STILL don't have any clue as to the identity of the congressman's "whistleblower".  

Nevertheless, this does not matter to Schiff and his fellow Democrats.  The only thing that matters is that the president is guilty, the presumption of "innocent until proven guilty" be damned.  Congressman Schiff has stepped over the proverbial line; he is not merely investigating, he is persecuting.  

Now, it is obvious to me that Adam Schiff has become today's Joseph McCarthy.  Perhaps there are some personalities willing to challenge the congressman, but I'm not seeing that.  It is unfortunate to note that there seems to be no Edward R. Murrow among today's media.  If this is indeed the case, I am willing to take on that role.  

Mr. Schiff's shenanigans must be called out for what they are; unfounded, destructive, and a grave danger to our republic.  For as long as this sham of a procedure goes, I will be "in the catbird's seat", challenging the Democrats at every turn.  Call me a rabble-rouser if you want, but I cannot stand by and let this perverted power play go unchecked.  Indeed, I say that "it is better to raise hell than to live in it".  

An International Injustice

Have you heard about the case of one Linda Carty? She is an American and British citizen who has been convicted of the murder of a "Joana Rodriguez" (such conviction having happened in 2002).  Ms. Carty claims that, owing to her previous status as a drug informant, she has been framed in this case.  However, state and federal courts disagree with this assessment, and all of Carty's appeals have been exhausted.  (1)

Carty now sits on death row in the state of Texas, awaiting her execution. (1)  Her only hope to be spared now lies with receiving a pardon from President Donald Trump.  

Here's a bit of background on the issues surrounding this case.  

Issue #1: Recanted Testimony.  

 Several witnesses, having testified for the prosecution, later testified that they lied under oath (due to threats made by said prosecution). (2)  Nevertheless, state prosecutors deny that any such threats were made. (3)  Two questions present themselves here, both dealing with the issue of credibility.  First, might the witnesses have lied about threats that were allegedly made to them? Second, why would said witnesses tell such lies, if indeed the allegations of prosecution threats are false? These questions have been left unanswered to this day.  

Issue #2: Rule of Law/Assumption of Innocence.  

 According to the state court, the possibility of false statements having been made is "immaterial", and does not matter.  The defendant has been convicted; as such, "what's done is done".  

"Ultimately, it (does) not matter whether Carty was the ringleader...whether Carty entered Rodriguez's apartment, whether Robinson actually saw Carty put the bag over Rodriguez's head, or even whether Rodriguez was dead when Robinson tore the plastic bag that was wrapped around Rodriguez's head...Carty was convicted as a party to capital murder" -- State Court's Decision Regarding Appeal (of Defendant)  (3)

Let's take a look at that again.  The Court specifically says that the question of Carty's innocence "DOES NOT MATTER".  

 In America, the accused is "innocent until proven guilty".  If the prosecution does not prove its case "beyond a reasonable doubt", then the defendant must be acquitted.  Now, if the original testimony of the prosecution witnesses was false, isn't that enough to establish "reasonable doubt"?  (4)

 In addition, does the Court mean to say that the presumption of innocence no longer matters, and that if the state says you're guilty, you're guilty? How "Nineteen Eighty-Four" like that is; "two and two make five, if the Party wishes it"!  (5)

Other Issues:

• The court-appointed lawyer for the defense was clearly incompetent.  Said attorney failed to cross-examine witnesses, and also failed to raise several different legal arguments.  These failures having taken place, the defendant had no chance to be acquitted.  (2)  

• The defendant (as previously stated) is a dual American/British citizen, having been born in a Caribbean territory of the United Kingdom.  That territory is now an independent nation; at the time of the defendant's arrest, it was a British colony.  By international law, British ambassadors are required to be notified immediately upon the arrest of a British citizen.  In the case of Ms. Carty, this notification didn't take place until after Carty's conviction and sentencing.  (6)

• The defendant has testified that, in a violation of due process, she was not allowed access to counsel during her interrogation(s).  (7)

This is the kind of legal case that makes me shake my head.  Ms. Carty is sitting on death row largely due to questionable evidence, as well as "shady" tactics by the prosecution.  To say that this is an injustice is, in my humble opinion, inaccurate.  Rather, it should be said that this case is an INTERNATIONAL injustice.  I hope to see this injustice soon addressed via the remedy of presidential pardon.  Let's get that pardon done and issued, President Trump...before it's too late.  

(Disclaimer: I have no legal qualifications, and do not claim to be an attorney.  This is simply the opinion of an informed and "concerned citizen")

Thoughts On Liberalism

In my general opinion, I'm a pretty decent guy.  It has been said that I have a strong moral compass; indeed, I don't cheat, steal, or habitually lie.  I have my likes and dislikes, but I basically live my own life, and let others live theirs.  Nevertheless, there are some people who (because of my conservative beliefs) see me as their mortal enemy.  Even now, I can hear the chants from "haters"; "racist, sexist, anti-gay...(insert expletive here) Nazis (or "Trumpers") go away". 

There is a common word for these people, and that is "liberals".  They hate conservatism, and the American way of life, so much that they are willing to commit violent acts on people like me.  And trying to reason with them, or explain your position, is "like talking to a wall". 

Now, I'm not a huge fan of commentator Michael Savage (in particular, I find his views on autism to be..."bothersome", shall we say).  However, he frequently says something on his radio show that (in the past four years) I have come to regard as true.  Dr. Savage explains that "how liberals can have such hatred in their heart(s)...how they will take the side of the enemy....can only be answered with one statement; 'liberalism is a mental disorder"(1).  Might the good doctor, who holds a PhD, be correct?

Science tells us that a fully functional human brain behaves in certain ways; this behavior includes logic, and "rational thinking".  As I have briefly explained, liberals seem to either not have the capacity to think rationally, or not be willing to use that capacity.  That is in contrast to a brain which is, to coin a phrase, "running on all cylinders". 

Putting this in the most civil/non-controversial way I can, I believe that a liberal's brain has some kind of condition that prevents that.  Enter Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary for one of the definitions of "disorder" (a noun):

• "An abnormal physical or mental condition"

Thus, the phrase "mental disorder" is an appropriate fit in this case. 

Now, a disclaimer.  I should mention that I am by no means a professional psychologist, nor do I have any kind of degree in such studies.  My opinion is merely that of a reasonably well-informed person, albeit one who has dabbled in beginning psychology.  I will leave official diagnosis to the actual experts.  

Quotes, Revisited (Or, "The Rerun")

Re-posted from an earlier date.  

Just a collection of quotes that I've recently been thinking about.  

• "May ye be in heaven half an hour before the devil knows you're dead" -- Old Irish blessing

• "It's not easy being green" - Kermit the Frog

• "If you're going through hell, keep going" - Sir Winston Churchill

• "We should do three things every day of our (lives)...laugh...think...and...have (our) emotions moved to tears. That's a heck of a day!" -- Jim Valvano (1946-1993)

• "And hast thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!', he chortled in his joy" - Lewis Carroll ("Jabberwocky")

• "It will soon pass, whatever it is" - Bobby McFerrin ("Don't Worry, Be Happy")

• "Always go to other people's funerals. Otherwise, they won't come to yours" - Yogi Berra

• "It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant.  It's just that they know so many things that aren't so" - President Ronald Reagan

• "This above all; to thine own self be true.  And it must follow, as the night the day, thou canst not then be false to any man" - William Shakespeare ("Hamlet", Act 1, Scene III)

• "No one ever got anywhere by half-assing it" - My father

• "Be quick, but don't hurry" - John Wooden (1910-2010)

• "One good thing about music; when it hits you, you feel no pain" - Robert Nesta (Bob) Marley (1945-1981)

• "Emancipate yourself from mental slavery; none but ourselves can free our minds" - Bob Marley

• "To everything there is a season, and a time for every purpose unto heaven" - Ecclesiastes 3:1 (quoted by "The Byrds' in 'Turn! Turn! Turn!")

• "If you want respect, give respect" - Me

• "Remember that somewhere, someone somehow has it worse off than you do" - Me

• "Don't ever be afraid to see what you see, believe what you believe, and say what needs to be said" - Me, with thanks to President Ronald Reagan

• "You can't always get what you want; but if you try sometimes, you might find you get what you need" - Mick Jagger & The Rolling Stones

• "Every man's heart one day beats its final beat; his lungs breathe their final breath. (And) if what that man did in his life makes the blood pulse through the body of others...then his spirit will be immortalized...by the memory of those who honor him, and make the running the man did live forever" - James Hellwig, AKA "The Ultimate Warrior/Warrior" (1959-2014) (1)

1 Author's note: Mr. Hellwig passed away on April 8, not quite twenty-four hours after making this speech.

Birthday Thoughts

On this, my thirty-eighth birthday, I bid you greetings from the Constitution State of Connecticut.  Having just completed another orbit of the sun, I find it suitable to talk about my journey so far.  

My life has been filled with ups, downs, and occasions when I didn't know what direction I was going in.  I am fortunate that my gifts have been many, and my troubles few.  There are no words to describe how thankful I am to God for this.  He has indeed been good to me, having blessed me with great friends, an intelligent mind, and a wonderful family (including the two best parents that a guy like me could ever want).  

Returning to the original discussion, I find that over the years, I have not just grown, but matured.  At one time, I was a boy, and did many boyhood things.  Now, I am a man; I believe that my former boyhood life ended long ago, along with many of its thoughts and experiences.  This maturation was not without difficulty; I had to go through some very dark days to get where I am now.  Lo and behold, I have walked through the fire (so to speak), and survived the flames.  Even though my life is different than it was, I'm still here.  

Now, contrary to popular belief, I'm not always the most cheerful guy in the morning.  There are some days where I wake up feeling grumpy, depressed, or that I've awakened "on the wrong side of the bed".  Life is not the easiest thing to go through; then again, who ever said that it would be? WWE's Undertaker said it best; "sometimes it is hell trying to get to heaven".  Nevertheless, I have come to realize that I am lucky.  Some people go to bed at night, and never see another day; that is, they pass during the night.  I have been blessed to see another new morning, and a new dawn.  

"For I know the plans I have for you', declares the Lord, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future"  -- Jeremiah 29:11

PS: OK, OK, maybe only a "semi-intelligent" mind...LOL!!

Update On Fill Pile Mess

In a previous post, I commented that my hometown is in the midst of a toxic waste scandal.  Here's what has been happening recently regarding this issue. 

Last night, the Fairfield Board of Selectmen (the top executive committee in town politics) held a meeting to address, among other things, the fill pile controversy.  All three members of the Board (Democrat First Selectman Michael Tetreau, Republican Selectman Chris Tymniak, and Republican Selectman Ed Bateson) were in attendance.  (1)

Mr. Tymniak began the discussion by reading several statements into the record, and then turning his attention to the First Selectman.  "I absolutely believe this is a complete lack of leadership on (the First Selectman's) part from the beginning", said the Republican Selectman. 

This is where things began to get heated.  Citing "Robert's Rules of Order", Mr. Tetreau opined that Tymniak's remarks were not allowed.  In reply, Selectman Bateson commented that he was "allowed to criticize" the First Selectman's job performance.  Tetreau rejected this notion, saying "not while you're sitting in a Board of Selectmen meeting". 

Later debate centered around a warrant for the arrest of two former town employees.  In an attempt to explain the charges alleged, Selectman Tymniak began to read the statements contained in said warrant.  Town Attorney Stanton Lesser objected to this, pointing out that the relevant allegations must be proved in court, and may not be "necessarily true".  Fairfield Police Commissioner (and Chairman of the Fairfield Republican Party) Jamie Millington later remarked that signed warrants are "true and accurate to the best of (any police officer's) knowledge".  (1) (2)

Here's some other things that we know about this case. 

• In 2015, Police Chief Christopher Lyddy sought to meet with the First Selectman over concerns in what had become a criminal investigation.  This notwithstanding, First Selectman Tetreau chose not to meet with Chief Lyddy.  

• Town activity on this case goes back to at least 2011, when a state investigator looking into corruption charges (against former public works superintendent Scott Bartlett) requested to meet with the First Selectman.  Through legal counsel, the above meeting request was rebuffed.   

•  E-mails and other records seem to confirm that town officials previously knew of this matter, but did nothing about it.  (3)

• During the past week, lawyers for the Town sought to (by means of legal maneuvers) prevent a group of citizens from meeting with the State's Attorney.  (4)

• First Selectman Tetreau continues to vehemently deny that he had any previous knowledge of the situation.  He has also stated that he "did not remember" the investigator's request for a meeting (this request was apparently made in 2011).  

Obviously, things are beginning to get hostile in town, with each side throwing out accusations and charges of impropriety.  

This is my take on the matter; perhaps I'm reading too much into it, but it seems to me that SOMEONE is not being completely forthcoming.  Whether that is the First Selectman's office or the "whistleblowers" in this case is a matter of opinion.  

That being said, there is WAY too much bickering going on; the situation has gotten to the point of being a "he said, she said" case.  Hopefully, my fellow Fairfielders will realize that this serves nobody.  It's time for Fairfield to come together as a community, and solve this problem once and for all.  

More updates as I am made aware of them.  

How To Win A Primary Without Actually Winning

In which your author describes how to be a successful candidate in Bridgeport, Connecticut.

Step 1.  Be close friends with the state's election supervisor (in Connecticut, that position is filled by the "Secretary of the State", which is akin to "Secretary of State" in other states). (1)

Step 2.  Install a Town Clerk that is loyal to you, and will "rubber-stamp" your decisions and wishes.  

Step 3.  Have that same Town Clerk disqualify the majority of your opponent's petition signatures (see notes 1-3). (1) (2)

Step 4.  Even if you are defeated in the ballots cast on primary day, declare that absentee voting has made you the winner (see note 4). 

Step 5.  When confronted by concerned citizens on this issue, have this two-word response ready..."no comment" (see note 5).  

Step 6.  Bask in the knowledge that you have played such citizens for fools.  Laugh long and loud.  

Notes:

 1.  In Connecticut, it is possible for a candidate from a "major party" (read: Democrats and Republicans) to be endorsed by a "minor party".  In this manner, said candidate could receive votes from additional "third parties".  This is known as the practice of "cross-endorsement", or "electoral fusion".  See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_fusion#United_States for more information.  

 2.  In order to be accepted as a "minor party candidate", said candidate must petition for ballot access.  Successful petitions are those which gather at least one percent of the total number of votes cast in the last election (for a certain office).  In this instance, Ms. Marilyn Moore (the declared loser of the primary) was trying to register as a "Working Families Party" candidate.  She needed to gather two hundred and seven signatures in order to do this.  

 3.  According to the Connecticut Post, Bridgeport Town Clerk Charles Clemons (an ally of incumbent Democratic mayor Joe Ganim) accepted only one hundred and sixty eight of the two hundred and seventy signatures that Ms. Moore's team submitted.  The rest were declared to be invalid, and rejected.  As such, the Secretary of the State announced that Ms. Moore will not be able to run (in the general election) under the Working Families Party banner.  This is significant because it means Ms. Moore's only option is to mount a write-in campaign. (3)

 4.  When all the votes cast on primary day were counted, it seemed that Ms. Moore had won the endorsement of the Bridgeport Democratic Party.  However, according to election officials, absentee voting totals were enough to give the victory to Mayor Ganim.  This is a matter of some concern; according to these same officials, twelve percent of all votes cast were by absentee.  Such a number of absentee ballots is significantly higher than the average amount, which suggests possible misconduct regarding the vote count.  

 5.  As of now, Mayor Ganim has had no comment regarding allegations of fraud or misconduct.  

Thoughts on September 11th

In describing my feelings about the terrible events of September eleventh, I must refer to a quote by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.  

"December 7th, 1941, a date which will live in infamy; the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan" -- President Franklin D. Roosevelt (December 8, 1941) (1)

Hopefully, you realize that the bright, early autumn day in question was my generation's "date of infamy".  It was a day of death and destruction that nobody thought could ever occur.  

Even almost eighteen years later, I still remember where I was when I heard the news of the attacks.  On that day, I was visiting my mother in South Florida.  I had just woken up from the previous night's sleep; my recollection is that the sky was a brilliant shade of blue, even in Florida.  Suddenly, I heard my mother say, "turn on the TV, the World Trade Center's on fire".  My reaction was one of utter amazement; I had to rub my eyes to make sure I wasn't still asleep (this was just before the second crash).  

In the next moments of the day, my innocence (and that of many others) was shattered forever.  As I watched, stunned by the scene unfolding, ANOTHER large jet crashed headlong into the Trade Center.  

I don't recall much about the next few minutes; it is a blur to me.  What I do remember is my reaction upon hearing that Washington was under attack ("the Pentagon TOO?!"), and sitting before the television, my jaw having fallen through the floor (as opposed to it being "on the floor"). 

Then, something really strange happened.  

Looking at a shot of the burning (South?) Tower, I commented to my mother that the building seemed to be leaning a bit.  To this day, I remember exactly what I said; it was "does that tower look stable to you?" 

There are no words to describe the gravity of the next moments.  What I witnessed was, in all likelihood, the most horrific thing I have ever seen in my life (the word "horrific" doesn't even come close to illustrating the terror of that day).  Before an audience of millions, perhaps even billions, the (South?) Tower buckled...and fell in a gigantic dust cloud.  The (North?) Tower would do the same some time later.  

As the buildings fell, they took with them the lives of many innocent people.  It wasn't just Americans who were killed on that day; it was people of every stripe.  Many of the lives lost belonged to everyday citizens; those blue-collar workers who showed up to do their jobs, day in and day out.  These men and women thought they would come home to their families that night; history had other plans for over three thousand souls.  

It has been said that "time heals all wounds".  Even so, the man who coined this phrase probably could've never fathomed the absolute horror of this September day.  

The wounds associated with the events of September eleventh are still fresh, like a cut that does not heal.  They irrevocably changed America, indeed the entire world.  And yes, we lost a little bit that morning.  Yet. here we stand, still the proud beacon of "liberty enlightening the world" (the original name of the Statue of Liberty).  To paraphrase Mel Gibson in "Braveheart", our enemies may have taken American lives, but they will never take American freedom.  

Thanks for reading. 

"No matter how long it may take us...the American people, in their righteous might, will win through to absolute victory" -- President Franklin D. Roosevelt (December 8th, 1941) (1)

Update From The Genealogy Files

Frequent readers of this blog will note that I have been doing research into family origins.  Specifically, I have been investigating a possible link to the McMahon family of professional wrestling.  

From a previous post, here's what I've come up with so far.  

"As the result of my searches on Ancestry.com, I have found that my grandfather on my father's side (George Boland Sr., 1903-1962) was married to a Margaret M Curtin (1904-1979).  This woman was the great-granddaughter of a Mary McMahon, from County Clare, Ireland.  Through additional research, I have discovered that the McMahon wrestling family has its roots in the same area of Ireland that Mary was from.  This points to at least a reasonable possibility of a link between my family and the McMahons of WWE. 

OK, this is where the plot thickens a bit, as there is one more mystery yet to be unraveled.  Vincent Kennedy McMahon is the great-grandson of a Roderick James McMahon (1848-1922).  It is this man who immigrated from Ireland, thus starting the American side of the McMahon family.  My Ancestry.com research hits a (pay) wall in the generations before Mary McMahon; I do not know who her parents were, and if she had any siblings.  This unknown has proven to be the final part of the puzzle. 

You see, if Mary was (a) sister to Roderick James, then the evidence shows that I am indeed related to the wrestling McMahons.  At the moment, I have no idea whether this is the case.  However, if true, this would be an astounding coincidence (as I am a huge fan of WWE).  To quote Joey Styles, my reaction would be something like 'oh my God"

The latest report is this...although I don't yet know the answer to my question, I'm making progress on finding what that answer is.  

Earlier, I posted a general inquiry to the genealogy forums on Ancestry.com, asking for information on Roderick James McMahon.  Hopefully, I will soon get get some news on this, and be able to conclusively say "yea or nay" on the issue.  

As always, I'll keep you informed regarding any new developments...

..."when news breaks out, we'll break in" !

What A Mess

In case you haven't been following the news lately, my hometown of Fairfield has a major scandal on its hands.

Recently, it was revealed that public works officials illegally dumped toxic waste on town-owned land.  They then used soil associated with this waste as fill material in town projects, such as the improvement of Gould Manor Park.  This being a significant news story, I thought I'd sum up what we know so far.

Here are some of the facts involved in this case.

• In 2013, a company known as "Julian Development" was awarded a three-year contract to manage Fairfield's waste pile.  

• Town officials used contaminated materials from the waste pile as topsoil for various town properties.  These properties include Gould Manor Park, as well as fields at several public schools.  

• The Superintendent of Public Works has been fired, and another senior official has been placed on leave.  In addition, the State's Attorney is pursuing criminal charges against Julian Development, as well as certain town officials. (1)  

• Through the environmental firm of "Tighe & Bond", various sites are being tested for soil contamination.  

• Four out of the nine sites already tested are contaminated, and will require remediation.  These sites include Gould Manor Park, Jennings School, Mill Hill School, and Riverfield School.  

• Remaining school athletic fields have been closed for testing.  The Board of Education will decide when these fields are re-opened.  

• Contamination notwithstanding, the First Selectman's Office has remarked that athletic fields "have low levels of contamination", and are "safe". (2)  

• Evidence shows that the town may have known about this issue as early as 2014, yet done nothing about it. (3)

• A check of related documents reveals that the town has a lease with Julian Developments regarding a building belonging to the Board of Education.  This monthly lease continues to be in place, even after the filing of criminal charges against Julian. (4)

• This is not the first scandal involving current First Selectman Michael Tetreau.  Last year, a matter arose involving the composition of the Board of Selectmen (with the resignation of a selectwoman from the GOP, the town tried to force a special election.  This was ruled improper by state courts). (5)

Now, some personal questions that I have on this matter.  

First, if athletic fields are "safe", as the First Selectman's office claims, then why is it necessary for these fields to be "remediated"? You don't fix a problem that doesn't exist....SHADY!!

Second, the First Selectman is responsible for the oversight of all town-related departments.  How could he have not known about this situation months/years ago? Basically, what did the First Selectman know, and when did he know it?

Finally, why is it that the town is maintaining a lease with Julian Developments, even after formal criminal charges have been filed against that company? Wouldn't it be better for the town to sever all ties with Julian?

It goes without saying that this "toxic" scandal is big news, and developing by the day.  I'll keep you posted on any and all significant happenings in this case.  

Matt's Quote Book

Just a collection of quotes that I've recently been thinking about.  

• "May ye be in heaven half an hour before the devil knows you're dead" -- Old Irish blessing

• "It's not easy being green" - Kermit the Frog

• "If you're going through hell, keep going" - Sir Winston Churchill

• "We should do three things every day of our (lives)...laugh...think...and...have (our) emotions moved to tears. That's a heck of a day!" -- Jim Valvano (1946-1993)

• "And hast thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!', he chortled in his joy" - Lewis Carroll ("Jabberwocky")

• "It will soon pass, whatever it is" - Bobby McFerrin ("Don't Worry, Be Happy")

• "Always go to other people's funerals. Otherwise, they won't come to yours" - Yogi Berra

• "It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant.  It's just that they know so many things that aren't so" - President Ronald Reagan

• "This above all; to thine own self be true.  And it must follow, as the night the day, thou canst not then be false to any man" - William Shakespeare ("Hamlet", Act 1, Scene III)

• "No one ever got anywhere by half-assing it" - My father

• "Be quick, but don't hurry" - John Wooden (1910-2010)

• "One good thing about music; when it hits you, you feel no pain" - Robert Nesta (Bob) Marley (1945-1981)

• "Emancipate yourself from mental slavery; none but ourselves can free our minds" - Bob Marley

• "To everything there is a season, and a time for every purpose unto heaven" - Ecclesiastes 3:1 (quoted by "The Byrds' in 'Turn! Turn! Turn!")

• "If you want respect, give respect" - Me

• "Remember that somewhere, someone somehow has it worse off than you do" - Me

• "Don't ever be afraid to see what you see, believe what you believe, and say what needs to be said" - Me, with thanks to President Ronald Reagan

• "You can't always get what you want; but if you try sometimes, you might find you get what you need" - Mick Jagger & The Rolling Stones

• "Every man's heart one day beats its final beat; his lungs breathe their final breath. (And) if what that man did in his life makes the blood pulse through the body of others...then his spirit will be immortalized...by the memory of those who honor him, and make the running the man did live forever" - James Hellwig, AKA "The Ultimate Warrior/Warrior" (1959-2014) (1)

1 Author's note: Mr. Hellwig passed away on April 8, not quite twenty-four hours after making this speech.

Re: Thoughts On Women's Soccer

Apparently, I'm not the only one who thinks this way.  (Disclaimer: The video below contains some vulgar language..."let the (viewer) beware")

THIS is how it's done.  GREAT JOB, and kudos, Coach!

Career Frustrations (or, Am I Already Hitting A Mid-Life Crisis?)

Greetings once again from the land of the living dead, aka Connecticut.  Today, let's talk about jobs, and the struggle to succeed in one's chosen profession. 

If you've been following me for a while, then you know that I love music, radio, and the media scene in general.  Operating my small (Part 15, FCC authorized) radio station is an activity that I thoroughly enjoy, and which brings me a lot of happiness. 

Nevertheless, the daily grind of broadcasting can be quite difficult to deal with.  Obviously, radio is a very tough and competitive business.  If you don't already have some radio experience, most prospective employees won't talk to you.  Having applied for many a choice position, I have first-hand knowledge of this situation.  Unless you really know your stuff (I think I do), it can be very challenging to even "get your foot in the door". 

Allow me to describe the current state of southern Connecticut radio.  I would love to be on the air at a decent-sized station, doing either music or a local political show.  However, the current industry climate leaves me with almost no opportunity for this. 

A non-political music show would fit splendidly on Bridgeport's WPKN.  Alas, it seems that the political divide has reared its ugly head.  The station is VERY left-leaning politically; so much so that, being a conservative (in terms of political beliefs), I can't get management to even pick up the phone for me (more on that later).  As such, any possibility of doing a show on WPKN is out the window.  "Diversity" and "free speech" my foot!

Fairfield University's WVOF would be another option for my programming.  For a college radio station, "the Voice of Fairfield" has very good signal coverage.  The problem here is in trying to contact station staff.  It's usually pretty easy to contact someone with the university; for WVOF, not so much.  Management doesn't seem to like to reply to e-mails, and good luck reaching a human on the station's staff through the phone.  This makes any show development very much a losing battle. 

What about other stations, do you ask? Don't even try to get anything started with Sacred Heart University's WSHU, as they don't seem to air local programming.  Staples High School (in Westport) has an award-winning station in WWPT.  Nevertheless, a show on this station is not possible either, since you must be a Staples student to be allowed on air.  WGCH is an excellent small station out of Greenwich (and where my friend Rob Adams works).  This notwithstanding, my chances of getting on the air at this station seem slim at best (although I'd appreciate any positive references you could make).  Then there's WICC out of Bridgeport, which having a show on is (to coin a phrase)  an "I don't think so" type of situation. 

As you can see, opportunities regarding radio in Connecticut are quite few and far between.  Realizing this, I have started to question whether I am cut out for the radio industry.  As shocking as this may be, I am rapidly approaching my fortieth birthday.  This September, I will turn thirty-eight years old.  Perhaps I'm simply having an early version of a mid-life crisis, but a few questions are starting to pop up, such as:

• Do I have my sights set too high, so to speak? Am I aiming for something that I can't hit?
• Is what I do good enough for a regular radio spot?
• Is it worth it to continue to pursue a job in broadcasting? Should I give up, and do something else? (This is the most important question of all)

These are questions that I haven't found the answer to as of yet.  You would think that, after eighteen years of paying dues, someone would want to take a chance on me.  Alas, that has not happened.  So it is, seemingly, that I have a bit of thinking to do.  

Over the next week or so, I'm going to carefully consider how I wish to move forward (not saying that I'm giving things up, just pondering).  Right now, I have no idea what I'm going to do; to quote my father, I'll "cross that bridge when I get to it".  Let the mid-life crisis commence! 

Thoughts On Women's Soccer

If you've been following the latest sports news, then you probably know that the US Women's Soccer team is in the World Cup.  They are scheduled to play the Netherlands in the gold medal match later today. 

On any other occasion, this patriotic American would be rooting hard for our ladies, and chanting "USA".  However, I cannot bring myself to do that for this match; indeed, I almost hope that the Netherlands will win.  Let me explain why this is. 

In case you didn't get the memo, the national team's Megan Rapinoe has declared that, should the US team win, she would not be visiting "the fu***** White House" (it is an accepted custom for the president to invite championship teams to the residence).  The midfielder (and national team CAPTAIN) has also said she will "probably never" salute/stand for the national anthem again.  I'm sorry (well, actually not), but this is not a winning attitude, and it doesn't fly with me.   

Let me break this down for you; I've always been of the opinion that, regardless of their political beliefs, athletes should show respect for the country that they represent.  By refusing to stand for the flag and anthem, Ms. Rapinoe has shown a deep disrespect for the United States.  Not only that, she is the captain of the national team; thus, she should exude leadership by example.  Rapinoe has failed to do this. 

Digressing for a moment, do you want to know why quarterback Colin Kaepernick can't find a job anywhere in professional football? The reason is not because of the color of his skin, or because he is being "blacklisted" (as he so often claims).  It is because he is a disrespectful, snot-nosed punk of a person...and he doesn't have much game anyway.  Kaepernick should consider himself damn lucky to have any sort of deal with Nike (burn their shoes anyway).  Hey Colin, "put that in your pipe and smoke it"!

Anyways, back to the matter at hand.  Myself, I've never coached any type of sports team.  Nonetheless, if I was a coach, I would lay down the law.  One of my simple rules would be, to quote the movie "Miracle", "the name on the front is more important than the name on the back".  Simply put, if you want to play on my team, you will show respect.  That means that when the anthem plays, you will STAND....OR YOU WILL SIT FOR THE ENTIRE GAME! 

I don't care what your political beliefs are.  I don't even care if we lose because you're not playing.  Everyone, from the captain down to the most reserve bench players, will stand and respect the flag.  If you're not willing to do that, then not only are you not worthy of being a team leader, you're not worthy of taking the same court, ice, or field as everyone else.  I would even have a mind to dismiss you; if you're not going to have a winning attitude, perhaps the team would be better off without your services.  I may take some flak for this, but that's the way it is, and that's the way it would be. 

By allowing Megan Rapinoe to play today (along with apparent supporters Ali Krieger, Becky ("Sour-Face"?) Sauerbrunn, and Ashlyn Harris), the coach of the US team is sending a message that he (she?) will tolerate this disrespect, as long as the team wins.  The coach doesn't care about leadership and attitude; all he/she cares about is "getting paid".  This is something that I do not, and cannot, support.  The Women's National Team should play their game with honor and dignity.  If they aren't willing to do so (even though I hate to say this), then I guess it's "go Netherlands" for me.  "Sad"!

Genealogy: Another Update

If you've been following this blog, then you know that I have taken an interest in the history of my family.  Recently, I have been researching whether I could possibly be related to the McMahons of wrestling fame.  My personal investigation into the matter has (thus far), produced this, along with this update. 

I'm happy to report that my research has been progressing well.  In case you missed it, here's a brief summary of what I'm talking about. 

"A few months back, I was doing some research concerning my family tree, and relatives (I was able to trace my parents back through multiple generations).  In the course of my exploration of this topic, I happened upon a relation (on my father's side of the family) that is linked to a family of McMahons...realizing this, I have started to wonder whether I could be at least distantly related to the McMahon wrestling dynasty".  

Moments ago, I took it upon myself to continue my examination of this issue.  Having done that, I think I may have happened upon a breakthrough.  It's a little hard to explain this, but here goes. 

As the result of my searches on Ancestry.com, I have found that my grandfather on my father's side (George Boland Sr., 1903-1962) was married to a Margaret M Curtin (1904-1979).  This woman was the great-granddaughter of a Mary McMahon, from County Clare, Ireland.  Through additional research, I have discovered that the McMahon wrestling family has its roots in the same area of Ireland that Mary was from.  This points to at least a reasonable possibility of a link between my family and the McMahons of WWE. 

OK, this is where the plot thickens a bit, as there is one more mystery yet to be unraveled.  Vincent Kennedy McMahon is the great-grandson of a Roderick James McMahon (1848-1922).  It is this man who immigrated from Ireland, thus starting the American side of the McMahon family.  My Ancestry.com research hits a (pay) wall in the generations before Mary McMahon; I do not know who her parents were, and if she had any siblings.  This unknown has proven to be the final part of the puzzle. 

You see, if Mary was (a) sister to Roderick James, then the evidence shows that I am indeed related to the wrestling McMahons.  At the moment, I have no idea whether this is the case.  However, if true, this would be an astounding coincidence (as I am a huge fan of WWE).  To quote Joey Styles, my reaction would be something like "oh my God"!

Obviously, this is a subject that I will continue to resolutely study.  I'll let you know what the outcome of my investigation is. 

"Until next time....if there IS a next time"  - Don Pardo, former announcer for WNBC-TV

Random Rant: Documentary Film Review

Right now, I'm watching "Uprising: Hip-Hop And The LA Riots", a documentary exploring violence and unrest in that city.  In my review, I find it necessary to explain the background of the film.  

On April 29, 1992, Los Angeles exploded in violence.  African-American residents of the area, angered by the acquittal of policemen in an excessive force case, destroyed whole sections of Los Angeles in acts fueled by rage (see the Rodney King incident).  Things got so bad that, in addition to the California National Guard, the US Army had to be dispatched to quell the violence.  When it was all over five days later, two thousand three hundred and eighty three people had been injured, and another sixty-three people killed (in addition, estimates of property damage were over one billion dollars).  

"Uprising" is a very interesting film that explores the roots of the LA riots, and what role hip-hop music played in them.  With the caveat that I haven't yet watched the entire movie, here are my thoughts on said film.  

This movie suggests that in 1992, African-American citizens of Los Angeles were tired of talking to the police about "law and order".  Black Angelenos, feeling that they were the victims of injustice, wanted action.  This, the film implies, was the main reason behind the rioting, which is hinted at as being justified.  What the documentary fails to explore is the opposing "devil's advocate" argument; it presents the events as being a one-way street, so to speak.  

I believe that to truly understand an issue, you must look at it from all angles, not just one.  To this end, I find that "Uprising" implies that whites, and only whites, were responsible for the violence of 1992.  This is an argument that I disagree with.  Yes, whites were to blame for much of what happened in the streets of Los Angeles; that is a sickening fact.  However, African-Americans are not without fault in this case.  Indeed, many blacks set fires, committed brazen acts of violence, and destroyed property (ask Korean shopkeepers about this; they were forced to take up arms in defense of their businesses).  

Now, it stands to reason that African-Americans are as much at fault for the events of 1992 as whites are, or anyone else.  However, "Uprising" doesn't discuss this point of view at all.  This being the case, I cannot give the documentary a totally glowing review.  

On the "Boland Movie Scale" of one to five stars, "Uprising: Hip-Hop And The LA Riots" receives a "captivating" three and three-quarter stars (thanks to long-time movie critic Susan Granger for the inspiration behind said scale).  The film is an interesting perspective on history, and what can happen when anger gets out of control.

A Graduation Speech

I can't claim to be a frequent speechwriter, or by any means a literary expert.  However, I'd like to think I've learned a little about life in my thirty-seven years on this planet.  As such, allow me to share the speech that I would give to the Class of 2019, if I was tasked with giving such a speech.  

(Speech Follows)

First off, I need to congratulate all of you on your success thus far.  Although it may not seem like it, you have spent four long years within the halls of your school.  In that time, you have faced many different types of challenges, but risen to meet all of them.  Now, a new challenge awaits you; that of creating the future.  

It's traditional at graduation ceremonies to give advice; I'm going to continue that tradition.  To that end, let me talk to you about life, dreams, and challenges.  

An old television commercial once said that "on the road of life, there are passengers and there are drivers".  In this case, you must be a driver, and take command of your own fate.  You see, nobody can drive down the road for you; nobody can sail the ship which you are in charge of.  It's up to you to live your own life, and to forge your own identity.  

I have to tell you that my life hasn't been an easy one, or simple.  I've had to fight my way through many tough times.  That's part of life; it's a bit like a prize fight, in that every day, a new round begins.  In my experience, I have found that "it's not about the dog in the fight; it's about the fight in the dog".  Life's not always about who can jump higher, or run faster.  More often, it's about who has more passion, and who has the most heart.  If you live your life with boldness and passion, you will find it to be a life well-lived, as will others.  I will suggest that you remember this as one of life's little lessons.  

Here's another important lesson that I have learned.  A great man once said that you must not "have any belief whatsoever in how others judge you; for your greatness will silence them all".  This is something that I very much believe in, down to my very core, I believe in myself.  However, it doesn't matter that I believe in my own abilities; what means more is that you believe in yours.  If someone tells you that you aren't good enough, ignore them! If they say something can't be done, prove them wrong!  Don't be afraid to dream big, or to pursue your dreams with reckless abandon.  For it is the dreamers and the thinkers that ultimately change the world.  

On the subject of life lessons, I have one more piece of advice for you.  One of my English teachers used to take inspiration from rock music.  In class, he would often recite lyrics from well-known songs, and then open discussion on the song's meaning.  On one occasion, I recall that I complained to this teacher about a poor grade that I had received.  The teacher, one Mr. Daley, said something that has stuck with me to this day; "in the immortal words of Mick Jagger, you can't always get what you want".  I believe this to be one of life's indisputable truths.  Sometimes, things won't go your way; sometimes, you will fail.  Nevertheless, don't give in, or ever give up! Instead, learn from your mistakes, and turn your failures into fuel for your successes.  Even when things seem to be at their worst, your greatest victory may be just around the corner.  

In my final words to you, the Class of 2019, I will say this.  Many people like to talk about the future as if it's some far-off moment.  What they don't understand is that the future is now.  Whether you realize it or not, you are and will be the architects of that future.  The choices that you make today will shape tomorrow.  There is but one thing that is certain in life; that is change.  The time has come for you, the members of the Class of 2019, to change the world.  

"The future is what you make it; make it a good one!" -- "Back To The Future Part III"   

What's The Deal With The Stop & Shop Strike?

As you may be aware, the management of "Stop & Shop" (one of the largest supermarkets on the East Coast) has been in an ongoing contract dispute with its employees.  On April 11, the local unions that represent some thirty-one thousand workers walked off the job, demanding a better deal from the company.  Here's a quick summary of the issues behind the dispute, and what has been offered. 

• Issue #1: Wages and Salaries.  

The unions claim that the company's proposed contract cuts employee pay, and replaces raises with annual bonuses(1).  In addition, the workers allege that Stop & Shop's offer eliminates certain weekend benefits.

  What's The Fact, Jack?

According to the proposal detailed at the company web site(2), all associates will receive increases in pay.  Additionally, Stop & Shop says that there will be no changes to weekend benefits.  

• Issue #2: Pension and Retirement Plans.  

Striking employees state that, under the current proposal, the company's share of pension monies would be greatly reduced (or eliminated altogether)(1).  The unions have requested that management agree to a twenty percent increase in such benefits.  

  What's The Fact, Jack?

Stop & Shop has agreed to the union's request regarding pension plans(2).  Part-time employees will see their benefits maintained at the current funding level.  

• Issue #3: Health Care.  

The unions claim that under the current proposal, their members would be forced to pay more money for standard healthcare benefits(1).  In addition, the workers allege that the company plans to end coverage for spouses of employees.  

  What's The Fact, Jack?

According to the company's proposal, employees will pay a little more for their healthcare than they presently do(2).  However, this cost will remain far less than the national average for worker heath plans.  Regarding coverage for spouses, some of the presently offered programs will no longer be available.

As you can see, many of the claims made by the striking unions are false, or at least incorrect in their logic.  The workers say that Stop & Shop's offer is unfair, and "unreasonable"(1).  However, looking at the facts in front of me, I believe the company's offer to be very generous.  

The question presenting itself is, to quote an old labor song, "which side are you on".  Do you support the striking workers, or are you on the side of company management? Personally, I will probably choose to cross the picket lines; some may decide to do differently, which is their right.  As is usually the case, there are two sides to this dispute.  The proper choice is a decision that is up to you, the individual shopper.  Choose wisely, my friends!

1. “Negotiations Update.” UFCW 919, United Food & Commercial Workers Union, 16 Apr. 2019, http://www.ufcw919.org/negotiations-update/.

2. “Stop & Shop Final Offer - UFCW Local 371.” Stop & Shop Stores, 28 Mar. 2019.

Today's "Raw Thoughts": My Take On John Oliver

For years, commentators have seen fit to criticize the "universe" of pro wrestling.  In the 1980s, the industry was blasted on "The Morton Downey Jr. Show" (though not by the host; he enjoyed wrestling events).  The 90s saw Phil Mushnick (a writer for the "New York Post") take pot shots at both WWE and WCW.  Then, in the 2000s, a group called the "Parents Television Council" sought to remove pro wrestling from TV altogether (what's worse, they ALMOST succeeded). 

As such, the comments of one John Oliver are not exactly "breaking news".  If you haven't heard, Mr. Oliver has taken it upon himself to call out the WWE.  On his HBO show "Last Week Tonight", the commentator advanced what I call "the Bob Costas argument".  Let me explain this in detail. 

Like Mr. Costas, Oliver contends that the men and women of wrestling are forced to take dangerous risks, and that this should not be permitted.  The commentator is clearly misinformed regarding this issue.  It is true that wrestlers risk severe injury from the moves that they perform.  However, these are calculated risks (as opposed to non-sensible risks), and performed of the wrestler's own free will.  Nobody (Vince McMahon included) is physically forcing the stars of WWE to "get in the ring"; they do it because they want to. 

This being the case, I wonder who Mr. Oliver (or anyone, for that matter) is to make individual choices for others? If certain people were incapable of making decisions for themselves, then I might understand his point of view.  However, realizing that most wrestlers can and do make their own choices, those decisions aren't Oliver's call.

The other part of the debate centers on certain actions and attitudes expressed on wrestling programming.  In the past, WWE has (to some extent) objectified women, as well as had a perceived bias against African-Americans and Hispanics (see Chavo Guerrero Jr.'s "Kerwin White" storyline).  Some observers (myself included) see this as objectionable behavior, or at least events that young children should not see.  Nevertheless, the question of what a child is permitted (or not permitted) to watch is best handled by that child's parents.  Again, who is Mr. Oliver to decide this?

Now, let's compare "Monday Night Raw" to some other popular television programs.  Most of the time, there's a difference between what happens on the show and "real life".  The longtime fan (such as myself) realizes that there is a scripted aspect to wrestling programming.  By that, I mean that the individual men and women of the business portray different characters.  Some of these characters are likeable; others are not.  Some characters say and do outrageously unacceptable things; others take the so-called "high road".  This is no different from most other television shows (for example, HBO's own "Game of Thrones", or NBC's "The Blacklist").  And quite frankly, if you are of the opinion that pro wrestling is completely "real", then much like a non-used mid-carder, I "have nothing for you". 

Knowing this, let me quote Vince McMahon in saying that pro wrestling isn't everyone's "cup of tea".  However, nobody is holding you at gunpoint, and forcing you to watch WWE events.  If you don't like the current product or show, you have the right to switch stations, or even turn the whole TV off.  Nevertheless, there are many people who get a great deal of enjoyment out of watching others get smacked around.  I believe that it is inappropriate for Mr. Oliver (who might best be described as a man who thinks he's "holier-than-thou") to tell such people what they can and cannot watch.  There is, indeed, some content that could be deemed "offensive" to certain viewers.  To this, I can only say that "viewer discretion is advised". 

A "Visionary" Idea (AKA "A Matty B Production")

A couple of days ago, I found myself watching one of the older episodes of "The Twilight Zone".  This particular feature was "The Obsolete Man"; a horrifying vision of what the future could look like.  Allow me to briefly describe what takes place in this tale. 

As the story begins, we see a man entering what seems to be a large hall or chamber.  Series creator and narrator Rod Serling intones,

"You walk into this room at your own risk, because it leads to the future, not a future that will be, but one that might be.  This is not a new world; it is simply an extension of what began in the old one.  It has patterned itself after every dictator who has ever planted the ripping imprint of a boot on the pages of history since the beginning of time.  It has refinements, technological advances, and a more sophisticated approach to the destruction of human freedom.  But like every one of the super-states that preceded it, it has one iron rule: logic is an enemy and truth is a menace.  

This is Mr. Romney Wordsworth, in his last forty-eight hours on Earth. He's a citizen of the State, but will soon have to be eliminated, because he's built out of flesh and because he has a mind. Mr. Romney Wordsworth, who will draw his last breaths in 'The Twilight Zone".   

"Mr. Wordsworth" has been accused by "the State" of being "obsolete"; that is, having no purpose or meaning to his existence.  Our protagonist testifies that he is a librarian; this does not sit well with his judge, an imposing figure called "the Chancellor".  We learn that "the State" has eliminated books; as such, librarians are regarded as not being needed.  As Wordsworth continues to testify, we find out that he believes in God.  Again, "the Chancellor" disapproves of this, as "the State" has "proven" that "there is no God".  

Subsequently, "Mr. Wordsworth" is convicted of being obsolete, and sentenced to death.  As is the apparent custom, our protagonist is allowed to choose how he will be executed, and at what time of day.  Wordsworth prefers to die at the hands of a personal assassin; this person will be the only one that knows of the exact manner of Wordsworth's death.  "The Chancellor" agrees to this stipulation, along with one other small request; that the execution of the now-condemned Wordsworth be nationally televised.  In the interest of not spoiling the ending, I will leave the remaining part of the story incomplete.  

The plot of this story has become embedded in my subconscious, and inspired me to creativity.  I find this to be something that is, perhaps, worth showing to today's audiences.  As such, I am considering modernizing the script somewhat, and showing it as a short film (perhaps on community television, or other such outlets)

When I speak of "modernizing the script", I mean that I would like to tinker with a few details, but keep the basic arc of the story.  For example, I might make the first name of "Mr. Wordsworth" to be "Ron" instead of "Romney".  I may also change Wordsworth's occupation to that of a "writer and humorist" (one that, nevertheless, expresses what he believes to be basic truths).  These actions would be taken with the intent of bringing the story up to date, and keeping it relevant for a modern audience. 

As explained previously, I believe that "The Obsolete Man" teaches us a lesson that is still very important.  In the words of Rod Serling, "any state, any entity, any ideology which fails to recognize the worth, the dignity, the rights of Man...that state is obsolete".  It is this tale of morality, and its teachings, that I hope to present to local viewers.  

Is the general public ready to witness "my epic vision"? Brace yourself, because a "Matty B Production" may be coming your way soon!

A Genealogy Update

Several months ago, I wrote this as one of my early entries for this, your favorite blog.  The article partially dealt with the history of my family, and my curiosity as to whether I might be related to professional wrestling royalty.  I am happy to report that I have an update regarding this matter. 

As I explained in the particular blog post,

"A few months back, I was doing some research concerning my family tree, and relatives (I was able to trace my parents back through multiple generations).  In the course of my exploration of this topic, I happened upon a relation (on my father's side of the family) that is linked to a family of McMahons...realizing this, I have started to wonder whether I could be at least distantly related to the McMahon wrestling dynasty".  

Tonight, I happened to be randomly pondering events in the "universe" of pro wrestling.  As a result of my deliberations, I began to research the origins of the current product.  I have unearthed some apparent facts that should prove to be VERY interesting.  Allow me, if you will, to clarify these issues.  

In summary:

• My last name is Boland; the family name is descended from the O'Bolands of County Clare, Ireland.  
• The name O'Boland evolved from the name "Boru", as in Brian Boru, an ancient High King of Ireland.  
• Brian Boru is a common ancestor of the Boland and McMahon families.  
• Two different Irish McMahon families exist; one that traces its roots to Clare (the "Thormond" McMahons), and another that has its ancestry in County Monaghan (the "Airgialla" McMahons).  
• The former group of McMahons are not related to the Monaghan-based McMahons(1)(2).  

Now, here's where things get even MORE interesting.  To wit:

• The McMahon wrestling family can be traced back to Roderick McMahon (1848-1922), a hotel owner and immigrant from County Galway.  
• Roderick and wife Elizabeth McMahon (1846-1936) produced four children, including Roderick James "Jess" McMahon.  It is this McMahon who (with others) founded the "Capital Wrestling Corporation", a forerunner to today's World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE).    
• Jess and wife Rose E. (Davis) McMahon (1891-1997) had three children, including Vincent J. McMahon (1914-1984).   
• Vincent J. was the father of Vincent Kennedy McMahon (today's Vince McMahon)(1)(2)(3)(4). 

OK, follow me so far? To further clarify this, we must delve into a bit of Irish history, and geography.  

• Galway is part of the Province of Connacht.  
• Clare is part of a different territory, the Province of Munster.  Nevertheless;
• Clare itself was once part of Connacht; in the tenth century, internal strife in Connacht caused Clare to be annexed to Munster (in a previous incarnation as the "Kingdom of Munster").  
• Upon its annexation, Clare was (for the time) renamed as Thomond(2).  

As I previously pointed out,

"According to my Aunt Eileen, my father's side of the family definitely has relatives with (the name of McMahon)".  

Let's break this down for a moment.  My research shows that the wrestling McMahons are descended from the Thomond-based (read: Clare-based) line.  This is the part of the family that can be traced back to Brian Boru, which I am ninety-nine point five percent certain is ALSO MY ANCESTOR (1).  As such, it is at least reasonable to suggest that I am indeed related to the McMahons of pro wrestling.  

(takes the above in for a moment)

Of course, this is an "oh my God" moment for me (thank you Joey Styles), as I have followed pro wrestling with interest seemingly all of my life.  

Now, might I be incorrect in my reasoning and assumptions? Perhaps there is something I haven't considered that proves my theory wrong? Clearly, the answer to this question is yes.  However, and "in any event" (thanks Vince), I believe that the evidence before me is astounding, to say the least.  

I'm going to keep my eye on this; I will attempt to confirm the above information through the Gaelic-American Club of Fairfield, CT.  The organization is a great resource for those who wish to learn about the Irish, or even just gulp down a "pint" or two.  

Anyways, that's "all the news that's fit to print" from the desk of Matty B.  Further updates on this matter will be forthcoming.  

"Until next time....if there IS a next time"  - Don Pardo, former announcer for WNBC-TV

1.  Personal knowledge.  

2.  Various online sources.  

3.  "WWE: Superstars > Hall Of Fame > Vince Mcmahon > Bio". WWE.Com, 2017, http://www.wwe.com/superstars/halloffame/vincemcmahon/bio/.  Accessed 2 Apr 2019.

4.  Irish Examiner. "The Fighting Irish And The WWE". 2013, http://irishexaminer.com/lifestyle/features/the-fighting-irish-and-the-wwe-243608.html. Accessed 2 Apr 2019.